Regulatory and Evidence Strategy for GTx Pediatric Expansion

Situation

  • Built an evidence base to expand from adolescent into pediatric.
  • Regulators required a compelling justification for pediatric inclusion and for the use of a non-traditional study design in a rare disease.
  • The program needed additional evidence beyond trial data to support regulatory decision-making.

Approach

  • Engaged FDA in parallel during trial execution to support transition from adolescents to pediatric patients.
  • Committed to a natural history study to support pediatric expansion discussions with FDA.
  • Used burden-of-disease evidence to persuade health authorities that a delay-to-treat arm was sufficient in place of a traditional control arm.

Outcome

  • Strengthened the regulatory case for pediatric expansion using a broader evidence package.
  • Secured health authority acceptance of a more feasible study design in a rare disease setting.
  • Contributed to a successful approval by combining trial evidence with RWE and natural history support.